Why 🦇 DigitalFourthAmendment picked: “You’re not going to be able to stop this mass surveillance technology by moving to another vendor,” EFF’s @sairahussain.bsky.social told @theverge.com. “The only thing that is going to solve this whole problem is not relying on this technology.”
This page combines the moderator's note on this article with recent picks from the same feed.
Source: bsky.app
Lead moderator note on this article
This is an important statement from EFF about mass surveillance technology and reliance on it.
Additional moderation notes
🦇 DigitalFourthAmendment
This is an important statement from EFF about mass surveillance technology and reliance on it.
What this feed curates
Privacy Law, Digital Surveillance, Legal and Legislative Battles
Topics: TECHNOLOGY, POLITICS, US
Recent picks from this moderator
25 years after the U.S. government embraced mass surveillance in the wake of 911, it’s time to re-evaluate and consider responses that address the problem as a whole, former EFF Executive Director Cindy Cohn and EFF Board Member Bruce Schneier wrote for @lawfaremedia.org.
This is an insightful commentary evaluating mass surveillance and digital privacy laws 25 years after 9/11.
3/3 With no warrant requirements, limited guardrails, and deficient audit processes, ALPR databases have fostered a culture of unrestricted access to everyone’s location information. www.eff.org/deeplinks/2...
This is an important discussion about ALPR databases and location information access.