Top US firms that backed Voting Rights Act donate to groups working to undermine it
theguardian.com Ā· 23d
šµThis is a news story about US companies and their contributions related to the Voting Rights Act.
Moderator!
Filter out the slop and browse the best of the open web
Top|Politics|Business|Technology|US|World
Recent picks on Voting Rights Act
See full feed
In Alabama Ruling, Supreme Court Signals Limited Role for Federal Courts in Redistricting Fights
nytimes.com Ā· Jun 3
šµHere's a clear NYT front-pageāstyle US news item about a Supreme Court ruling on redistricting, fitting the criteria for US/global news, non-opinion; strong match with central topic and relevance.
Supreme court approves Alabama map that erases majority-Black district
theguardian.com Ā· Jun 3
šµThis article reports on a US/Global news event (Supreme Court ruling on Alabama map), a front-page level topic aligned with major news; it is not opinion, but includes broader context. It fits well, though could be more clearly framed as a front-page headline without extra commentary.
āThey want the country to be what it was in 1776ā: anger in Memphis after Republicans redraw voting maps
theguardian.com Ā· Jun 2
šµThis is a US political news story about voting maps and the Voting Rights Act, aligning with criteria for US/global news; itās not opinion, but a news report.
Federal court blocks new Republican-friendly voting map in Alabama
theguardian.com Ā· May 26
šµThis is a US/world news item about a federal court blocking a Alabama voting map, a central political/ news topic. It avoids opinion pieces and is front-page style reporting; some context is present but not opinion.
āThey may draw racist maps, but we are the southā: thousands rally in Alabama for Black voting rights
theguardian.com Ā· May 16
šµThe content describes a US news event (Black voting rights rally in Alabama) and is clearly a front-page style topic with national/global relevance, aligning with the criteria to return US or global news front-page stories (excluding opinion pieces). It is not an op-ed or feature, and the subject is central to current events. Minor gaps: it's a Guardian article linked, but the item itself is a straightforward reporting piece rather than an NYT front-page selection, yet still fits the newsworthiness requirement.
Supreme court rejects Virginia Democratsā bid to restore congressional map
theguardian.com Ā· May 15
šµThe article concerns a major US political/legal event (Supreme Court ruling) about redistricting, which is timely and newsworthy. It is not an opinion piece and appears to be front-page-level international reporting from a reputable source (The Guardian). However, the explicit instruction wants front-page NY Times front page coverage; since the piece is from The Guardian and not necessarily NYT, there is a minor mismatch in source and publication, but topic and framing align with US/global news and avoid opinion pieces.
US southern states rush to redraw electoral maps to dilute Black voting power
theguardian.com Ā· May 14
šµThe article centers on US electoral redistricting and its impact on Black voting power, a current US political/news topic that would appear on front-page-level coverage; it is not an opinion piece and is clearly news-focused, with global relevance via voting rights context, though sourced from The Guardian rather than NYT front page.
Breaking news: The Supreme Court cleared the way for Alabama to redraw the stateās congressional map in favor of Republicans in light of the courtās decision to weaken the Voting Rights Act. The ruling could deliver an additional seat to the GOP.
bsky.app Ā· May 11
šµThe article discusses a US political event (Supreme Court ruling affecting Alabama congressional map) with potential impact on party composition, which is a current national news topic suitable for front-page NYT-style coverage; it is not opinion-only content and is newsworthy, though the exact front-page prominence would depend on editorial framing.
āWeāre going backwardsā: Five civil rights activists slam the supreme courtās gutting of Voting Rights Act
theguardian.com Ā· May 9
šµThe article concerns a US-wide civil rights issue (Voting Rights Act) and is about a major news event on the front page of a prominent outlet; it is not an opinion piece, op-ed, or feature, aligning well with the criteria.